Ever wondered why so many of those calculated years of birth from censuses are so consistently wrong by a year or so? For example, you know your great-grandfather, George, was born in May 1895 but Ancestry, FamilySearch and the others say it was 1896 because he was age 44 in the 1940 US census. The answer is that the standard method of estimating year of birth is wrong most of the time! Of course, that’s always assuming that your ancestor (or the person reporting their age at that point) knew what the correct age actually was!
Before I explain why, let me explain how to make a better estimate,
for any event occurring in the first half of any year, subtract an additional year.
Simple as that.
I can’t guarantee it will be correct but it will be correct more often than not. This works for all events where we know a person’s age on a particular date, whether censuses, migration records, military records, death records, divorce, marriage or whatever.
Since most major censuses have been held in the first half of the year I can say for sure that most birth year estimates from census records are wrong.
How so? Let’s go back to George.
The US census was held on April 1, 1940. That’s about a quarter of the way through the calendar year. So there is a 25% chance that anyone then age 44 was born in 1896 . . . . but the chance is 75% that he was born in 1895.
So, if the event is before June 30 in any year, to give you the best estimate for the year of birth, subtract the age from the calendar year and then deduct an extra year. For George, subtract 44 from 1940, leaving 1896 and then take off another year to give 1895, which is correct.
Hope that works for you. I know I promised to show some maps in my next post. I got distracted. You know how it is . . . . !
Paul Howes lives in New Jersey and when not indulging his obsession into family history is an executive coach. For most of his professional life he was an actuary and human resource consultant, having lived in six countries and worked in over 50. Paul has lectured on his award-winning study into the Howes, House, Howse and Hows names on both sides of the Atlantic. He has been a member of the Guild of One-Name Studies for four years and was recently appointed the US National Representative for the Guild.