Do you have royal last names hiding in your family tree? Do you suspect that some of your ancestors may have royal roots? If you can find one of the surnames from your family tree on the list below, you just might be right!
Many families have stories of royalty in the family tree — and while many of these turn out to be just that, stories — it sure can be fun to investigate. Even if you don’t have tales of Kings and Queens in your past, you might be surprised to discover that having noble connections is actually somewhat common.
One of the most obvious places to begin looking is at your early American ancestors (if you have them). A good deal of these families had aristocratic connections and there are a plethora of books that document these lineages.
Americans of Royal Descent by Charles H. Browning, published in 1891, was one of the first. It includes hundreds of surnames and documents the royal family trees of these individuals in detail. We’ve taken the time to list some of the last names from his below. If you don’t see a surname from your tree on this list you can access this book for free online via Hathitrust, where you will find thousands other family names with documented royal ancestries. Look at the index in the back of the book for the full list of names.
A rather interesting article on Browning, his book and related texts can be found here.
This book is certainly not the only (or most updated) source of information on the aristocratic lineages of early Americans. If your surnames are not mentioned in our list or in the book, don’t fear. There are many other books and resources to explore. (we’ve included a list below).
While it is fun to read through the following surnames, a good deal of additional research will be needed on your part if you do find a matching name. As with any aspect of your family history research, all information should be verified and properly sourced before it can be considered a correct addition to your family tree.
Don’t rely on the family trees you find published online, or a single book or resource, when researching royal connections. Many books and resources were published for vanity purposes only and contain very questionable information. Other books contain inaccuracies or are outdated. If you think you have found a solid connection to royalty you will likely be able to discover well-established and documented trees online. Connect with those who manage these trees and their related societies for the most accurate information available.
Here are 100 Royal Last Names
- Abel
- Alden
- Appleton
- Ayer
- Barber
- Barclay
- Beverly
- Binney
- Brooke
- Brown
- Campbell
- Carroll
- Chauncey
- Coleman
- Cooper
- Davis
- Dickinson
- Darling
- Douglas
- Dunbar
- Edwards
- Ellery
- Ellis
- Emmett
- Evans
- Farley
- Fleming
- Forest
- French
- Gardiner
- George
- Gerard
- Gerry
- Gibson
- Graham
- Hamilton
- Haynes
- Herbert
- Hill
- Howard
- Hume
- Irving
- Jackson
- James
- Jenkins
- Johnson
- Kane
- Kennedy
- Ker
- Key
- King
- Langdon
- Lawrence
- Lee
- Leonard
- Livingston
- Lloyd
- McCall
- McDonald
- Malcalester
- Montgomery
- Morris
- Morton
- Nelson
- Nicholson
- Nixon
- Norris
- O’Carroll
- Ogle
- Opie
- Parsons
- Patterson
- Peabody
- Pomeroy
- Porter
- Pratt
- Preston
- Quay
- Randolph
- Read
- Reeve
- Robinson
- Rogers
- Sanford
- Shaw
- Smith
- Sowden
- Stanley
- Taylor
- Townsend
- Turner
- Tyler
- Valentine
- Varson
- Walker
- Watts
- White
- Whiting
- Williams
- Young
Of course, having one of these royal last names in your tree does not necessarily mean you have royal ancestry – these names relate to specific individuals and not to the surname in general. Look these surnames up in the index of Browning’s book for more information on the person or persons who match these entries.
On the flip side, NOT finding your ancestors’ surnames doesn’t mean that you don’t have royal ancestry. The truth is, many, many people do. This list is just a fun sample of royal last names, and tha’s all. Check out Americans of Royal Descent by Charles H. Browning for his full list of early American names and explore the resources mentioned below for more information on searching for royal roots in general.
Here are some places to start when researching royal connections:
- Documenting Royal Ancestry on FamilySearch
- Noble and Royal Lineages from the Newberry Research Library
- Books on Royal Ancestry via The Digital Public Library of America
- The Directory of Royal Genealogical Data from Brian Tomsett and the University of Hull
We’d love to hear about your royal roots in the comments!
You might also like: 6 Signs It’s Time to Get Help from a Professional Genealogist
Image: Don Phillipe V. par la Gracia de Dinos Rey de las Espanas. c1703. Library of Congress
Guys I have a royal blood
Julie K Wombold Lopez related to The Royal Family by Blood. Duvall is my moms last name I’m related to Maureen Duvall, Robert Duvall also All the others are in there like George Bush and many more.
My last name is Masterman do I have any royal blood or even nobility running through my veins?
What do you do if you find out your strand royalty and have 5 other royalty houses or more
I have a few lines that connect me to royalty. But it seems the surname of Dickinson is most prominent for me. Especially on geni and relative finder. But, many years ago, we had a an old book in the family that was all about the Dickinson line that had been passed down to us. I remember my mom reading it and being in disbelief of how there were so many connections listed in the book and how this information could have been found out so long ago. over my years of studying the genealogy of our family, I’m finding all of what she told me to be true. I wish we still had the book.
Yep Evans and Andrews dating back to late 1600s on my mothers side.
I was born a Whitbeck but raised as an orphan. I’ve tried to find information beyond Jan Thomase Whitbeck (1600’s) Albany NY, back to Wedbek, Holstein, in the Netherlands. No luck there. So I looked under my mother (a Bingham) and took her name back to the year 970 AD to Sir John Bingham of Bingham Sutton England. My grandmother was a Hale, which changed to Haile and then to numerous ladys and lords, eventually going to the Capet and Plantagenet families. Along the way, I found a grandfather named John of Gaunt. All it took was some digging on Ancestry. Amazing for an orphan girl, huh?
Decendo de D1ARIENZO E DURSO, CASERTA MONDRAGONE ITALIA.
e OS ESPANHOIS RUIS SANCHES GALIAN
I have a relative Jane Hamilton married to Capt Robert Cooper. Doing my 10 generation genealogy I found her father was William Hamilton and his father Lord Alexander Hamilton married to Lady Elizabeth Pollock. Both have pedigrees back to William Wallace and many kings and queens. It was an easy find on Ancestry.
You’ve illustrated the article with a photo of a manic-depressive King.
I have been told my 3rd ggf Richard Harwood, born England 1795 was related to a member of Parliament. I have done limited research on this but no positive info. My great Aunt and a Bedford Co,Pa Genealogist told me this. Richard came to America about 1828 and was a school teacher inBedford Co., Pa.
If you’re non-Ashkenazi European, you have royalty in your heritage. The only questions are when, where, and how to prove it. It’s a foundational principle of both the pyramid and diamond theories of genealogy. I’m surprised that you didn’t discuss that.
The simplest way to find royal ancestry is to add your tree to a collaborative, “big tree” site like Geni and follow the paths, then confirm the evidence trail. No need anymore for people to keep reinventing the research wheel. I don’t particularly care about royals, but it’s neat to be able to click on any royal’s profile and see the path. All I have to do then it follow the documentation.
What is non-Ashkenazi European? I’ve never hear of this group.
Anne
Ashkenazi is the name for a group of mostly Eastern European Jews. Any other European group, even Sephardic Jews (Spanish and Portuguese mostly, I believe), are “non-Ashkenazi”. See the Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jews
Ashley, you’re absolutely correct! I’ve been amazed at the number of royals I’ve found in my own family tree, some of whom (in my dad’s line) I’ve found through historical records, while Geni has found a wealth of royals in my mom’s line, as well. Some are actually related through both lines, proving what a small world this really is. Charlemagne, for example, is my 40th great-granddad in my dad’s line, while he’s my 34th great-granddad in my mom’s line. I certainly don’t “feel” royal, nor do I need to, but it’s pretty cool to realize that you have those connections to human history.
Funny thing about this: I was just researching one of my lines from Colonial America (my 11th great gf George Morton and then I see this article. Not positive but I think his line goes back to the Markhams of 14th and 15th century England and a royal line of mine eninating from Queen Anne ….more research to do!!
What was George Morton’s surname? I have a gr gf George Morton Moore. He’s suppose to come from a line that had a lord in it. I haven’t been able to prove it yet.